|Link to web site|
"The iconic Jubilee Clock in Harlesden will be removed from the town centre so it can undergo vital repairs.
"The timepiece, which dates back to 1887, was damaged after a bus crashed into a shop in May.
This is an independent site, about Harlesden, Stonebridge, Kensal Green and Old Oak Common, London. Please add comments.
Note: There are some videos at the bottom!
NEXT: tba: Town Team meeting
|Link to web site|
"Over the past year the Mayor, Boris Johnson, has been calling on volunteers and community groups to apply for grants to help transform more of London’s unloved spaces into 'Pocket Parks' for local neighbourhoods to enjoy. 100 spaces have now been transformed with 42 of these being developed by constituted community groups as part of the Transform Pocket Parks initiative, led by Groundwork London."
"We know that in the early stages of a community group’s development there are a lot of things that seem daunting and can easily dent confidence and progress. One of this is whether allotment law applies to a site. It can be confusing to people not familiar with property law.The document is below, and also available to download from the 'Federation of City Farms and Community Gardens' website, via: www.farmgarden.org.uk/resources
But landowners too may find it mystifying for local authorities too. In particular, even if they would like to set up new sites, there can sometimes be some reluctance in case they can't then dispose of them easily."
|"I declare Station Road open"|
|Link to web site|
|Talk to the|
(His hands are actually that big. Creepy.)
|Link to the Brent Cross Railway|
During the last HNF meeting members were asked to discuss a range questions on five key topics prepared by Ken Hullock (planning adviser to the Forum), to help brainstorm ideas on key issues that are important to a neighbourhood plan for Harlesden. Participants were given 10 minutes to discuss each of the topics and write their ideas and concerns on flip chart paper provided. Below is an overview of some of the main concerns that participants addressed for each topic.
Questions:1. Should all existing employment sites, i.e. business premises, be protected or can some outside of the town centre be redeveloped for new housing (with businesses being relocated if necessary).
2. Are there too many betting shops / amusement centres / takeaways and, if so, how can their numbers be restricted.
3. Should Harlesden town centre be expanded south along Station Road to link up with Willesden Junction station and new commercial development associated with the regeneration of Old Oak?Feedback:
· Participants agreed that local culture is important to maintain
· Participants felt that more retail space could be used
· Participants felt that there are too many betting shops and fast food restaurants on the High Street
· Residents were curious as to ways they might be able to limit the number of betting shops and fast food restaurants, perhaps by restricting their distance from schools.
· HNPF could appoint someone to monitor new planning applications
· New housing developments should also bring employment opportunities
· More variety in retail options on High Street.
Questions:1. Should those travelling to Harlesden by car be better catered for, e.g. more parking?
2. Should there be more restrictions on the use of the car (e.g. less parking) and a focus on walking, cycling & public transport? If so what improvements can be made?
3. Does Harlesden need a by-pass, either now or in the future?Feedback:
· Participants did not believe the use of cars should be encouraged
· Too many trucks and traffic passing through the High Street
· Tesco car park is very insufficient and a major concern
· More parking is needed
· Bypass was looked upon favourably but with some reservations
Questions:1. How can the provision of parks and open spaces be improved for Harlesden residents? Is existing children’s play provision good enough or should it be improved and, if so, how?
2. Should more heritage assets be protected, e.g. more buildings listed, even if this means fewer opportunities to redevelop for much needed housing, etc.?
3. Are tall buildings (over 8 stories) acceptable in Harlesden? If so where are they acceptable and, if not, how are the much needed new homes going to be delivered?Feedback:
· There is a need to raise awareness of local heritage sites
· Overall participants wanted to limit tall buildings to the area towards Willesden Junction
· There was a desire to raise awareness of where local spaces are to increase use
· There could be more communal space for teenagers like a skate park
· More trees on the streets are wanted.
Questions:1. Are there enough premises available for the community to use for meetings, events, etc.? If not, how can these be provided and where?
2. Are there enough built sport and leisure facilities available to Harlesden residents? If not what would you like to see provided?
3. Should pubs be protected from development as community assets?Feedback:
· Many were concerned with a lack of secular gathering space, as there seemed to be few options other than pubs or spaces with religious affiliations
· There was support for protecting pubs within the community as long as they could be considered a community asset
· There were no strong feelings about a lack of built sports facilities
· People agreed that there could be an opportunity to provide community space with major development but they did not want big sites.
Questions:1. Given the need for new housing in Harlesden, what type of housing should be prioritised? Affordable rental property, e.g. social housing or homes for first time buyers?
2. Should new homes provided be exclusively flats or should some family homes with gardens be provided, even if this means building at lower densities and fewer homes being built?
3. Should new student housing or hostel accommodation be allowed in Harlesden?Feedback:
· Some participants thought that to afford a one bed flat at £280k a household would need to have an income of £25k, and was surprised to find that an income of £70k would be closer the mark
· Overcrowding and difficulty with landlords is a problem
· Similarly, one thought that shared ownership represents good value for money and affordability which is, depending on the specific scheme, far from clear
· For type of property, people were concerned that the mere fact of building flats would present a high risk of ASB
· Some participants were mindful of the need to retain density of population and to provide affordable housing for local people, but felt that these homes should be family homes with gardens. Given the amount of land likely to be available within the neighbourhood planning area (NPA), these are incompatible.
Question Time Brent
The theme for this debate will be: 'Living together in multicultural societies: respect, dialogue, interaction'.
You can submit questions now via Twitter using the hashtag #QuestionTimeBrent or book a free ticket online (places are limited, so book early). Alternatively contact Chris Young on 020 8937 4349 or email email@example.com to book tickets and/or submit questions.
|Link to web site|
Navin Shah (16-Sept-2015):Following your previous answers, can you now give a start date for four trains-per-hour on the Euston to Watford Junction line?
Will late evenings become three trains-per-hour at the same time? Will Sunday late evenings have the same timetable as other days of the week?The Mayor (16-Sept-2015):Depending on an agreement being reached with Network Rail to allocate more train paths to London Overground, TfL will be able to run four trains-per-hour from 2018 when it receives delivery of trains, which will boost the existing fleet. This can include Sunday services if there is sufficient demand.
TfL is currently planning to increase the number of trains after 22.00 on this route to three trains per hour in the December 2017 timetable.
Navin Shah (16-Sept-2015):What is the theoretical maximum number of London Overground trains per hour that could operate on the Willesden Junction to Gospel Oak section of the North London Line?
What enhancements to the infrastructure would be needed to reach that figure?The Mayor (16-Sept-2015):Under current Network Rail regulations, it is possible to achieve 13 trains per hour, if all available train paths were made available to passenger trains. In reality the most train paths that could be made available to TfL would allow approximately 10 trains per hour.
In order to increase the frequency on this route further it would need to be re-signalled as well as having improvements made to junctions, power supply and turnback facilities at the end of the route.
Navin Shah (16-Sept-2015):Since your new London Overground trains in North-East London will have some transverse seating as on the Metropolitan Line, why will you not introduce the same on your new Euston to Watford Junction trains?The Mayor (16-Sept-2015):Longitudinal seating provides greater overall capacity than a transverse seating layout. Some transverse seating will be included on the West Anglia routes as average passenger journey times are longer than elsewhere on the London Overground network.
Average journey times on the Watford Junction to Euston route are somewhat shorter and there are some heavily loaded sections, particularly between Willesden Junction and Queens Park. This means that the additional capacity provided by longitudinal seating is required.
In addition, trains on the Watford Junction to Euston route are drawn from a pool of trains, based locally at Willesden depot, that will also serve the Gospel Oak-Barking route. This sharing of trains across more than one route reduces costs, increases the availability of trains and makes the service more reliable.
Willesden Junction is a complex station and its footprint straddles the West Coast Main Line, the North London Line and the Watford DC Lines. There are no longer any platforms provided on the main lines, but the DC lines and the North London Line are both served.
The Low Level Station comprises an island platform with a central bay. The platform buildings are of masonry construction and the platforms are linked to the rest of the station by a footbridge and lifts. Alteration works are currently under way on the low level station in order to prepare it for the operation of five car trains. The station booking hall is located to the south of the platforms and is modern, having been completed only within the last five years. It is fitted with a standard gate line and LOROL type ticket machines; although a manned ticket office is also provided. The station staff reports that the booking hall is subject to congestion in the peak hours and a wider gate line system is required.
The High Level station is situated on a sharply curve where the North London Line is elevated on a steel viaduct as it crosses the WCML, and is located on top of the northern abutment of the bridge. The line is of twin track, but there is considerable separation between the two tracks and the station has an island platform configuration. The main structures date to a rebuilding in 1956 and the station building is a concrete framed structure incorporating staff rooms and subway links to the booking hall. The facilities are basic and the public areas are sparsely furnished. The staff facilities include a train crew signing on point which must be retained at the site.
The high level station is connected to the Booking Hall by a ramp walkway. This is open to the elements, having no canopy or side screens.
|(Click to enlarge)|
It is proposed that the reconstruction of the High Level Station should include the following works:
An initial cost study would suggest that this station can be rebuilt for a sum of approximately £3.9m.
- The 1956 concrete structure should be completely demolished and should be replaced by a modern steel framed building with extensive glazing. The accommodation must include a passenger waiting room, coffee stall or buffet, staff signing on point and platform staff accommodation. There should also be a covered lobby area containing the stairs and lifts linking to the low level station. Platform canopies should be provided, covering the same basic area as the current arrangement. The waiting room should be provided with a modern Passenger Information Display The ramp linking the high to low levels should be retained, but should be fitted with a canopy roof and glass side screens. The interior should be fitted with lighting to a modern standard
- The existing ticket office should be retained, but should be lengthened at its western end to permit the provision of a longer gate line with at least two more gates. In order to create enough space for this extension, it will be necessary to carry out works on the street frontage to extend the existing parking bays and to relocate the bicycle racks. The opportunity might be taken to place the bicycle racks inside a locking compound in order to increase their security
- The ticket office at the Harrow Road entrance should be removed and replaced by an extended gate line supported by automated ticketing facilities.
If only limited resources are available for the rebuilding of this station, a reduced project might be attempted. The following economies might be considered:
The reduced scheme might be delivered for a sum of approximately £2.4m.
- Remove the signing on point from the station, and provide the train crews with a dedicated building, probably a prefabricated structure of standardised type
- Retain the shell of the high level station, but re-clad it using modern materials and completely redesign its interior to create a more spacious waiting room and a small buffet
- Consider retaining the existing booking hall and gate lines at the low level station and at Harrow Road, thereby avoiding the building extension and associated highway alterations.
|Link to web site|
"I didn’t even know this little park existed until today, and now I have put my name down with two friends to tend one of the raised beds.
It's great to see how the hard work of Friends of Harlesden Team has reclaimed this space for local families."
The Town Team welcomes development at the Old Oak Common area, but wants walking, cycling and the use of public transport to be paramount, and wants to discourage extra use of the private car
The Town Team welcomes the aspiration of Boris the Mayor for a new London Overground service from Old Oak Common across Brent, via Harlesden and Neasden stations
This map roughly shows the area of the 'Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation', which has taken over the planning of the area from the three boroughs of Brent, Ealing and Hammersmith & Fulham
The new High Speed 2 and Crossrail station will serve as many passengers as Waterloo station. Old Oak Common may also generate 24,000 homes and 55,000 jobs. This map shows our suggestion for a 'Harlesden Bypass'. That will avoid all the extra traffic falling on the existing A404 Harrow Road / Harlesden High Street through Harlesden. We would try and divert all heavy lorries on to the bypass, instead of passing through Harlesden.
This map summarises all railway links in the area - existing, agreed, and speculative. The Town Town would lobby for the maximum investment in railway links like these, as well as for cycle routes and new and enhanced bus services.
(1) The 'high-level' platforms should be moved, so that a new booking office can be opened on the Harlesden High Street road bridge (part of the A404 Harrow Road).Please give any comments on this subject to the Town Team.
It would still be easy to get between those platforms and the existing 'low-level' platforms, for the Bakerloo Line and Euston-Watford Junction trains.
The horrible steep steps from Harlesden High Street and the long footpath to the station would be removed.
Instead, there would be wide covered steps, and a lift, directly from the booking office to the 'high-level' platforms.
(2) A wide and well-lit footpath over the main line tracks has been mentioned, from the Old Oak Common area. We want that path extended. It should connect to both Station Approach off Station Road, and to Harlesden High Street, next to the new booking office.
We don't want to allow road traffic over that bridge from Old Oak Common.
(3) The Town Team would support a new road across the station land. It would join up Station Approach and Harlesden High Street, and would reduce traffic on Tubbs Road and Nightingale Road. However, it might have to be limited to buses and cycles, to stop it being overwhelmed by traffic avoiding the centre of Harlesden.
"We are committed to making Brent a borough that is accessible for all and walking as a mode of transport is a key part of that aim.
Getting more people walking in Brent would mean fewer vehicles on Brent’s busy roads, it would mean better air quality for everyone in the borough and as a form of exercise, it would mean that residents are healthier too.
I would ask that as many residents as possible complete the questionnaire and let us know what we can do here to help make Brent a better borough."
The Harlesden Neighbourhood Planning Forum submitted a valid joint application to designate the Harlesden Neighbourhood Area and the Harlesden Neighbourhood Forum on 8 July 2015.
The joint application has been prepared by the Harlesden Forum to guide development in the Harlesden Neighbourhood Area. Neighbourhood Planning is a community-led process that enables people to help shape development in their local area. Once adopted a neighbourhood plan becomes part of the planning framework for that area.
The proposed neighbourhood area includes land within both Brent and the Old Oak and Park Royal Mayoral Development Area, as shown on the attached map. The Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) are the local planning authority in the Mayoral Development Area.
Brent Council and the OPDC have assessed the joint application and are satisfied that it complies with the statutory requirements as set out in the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 and Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
The joint application and supporting documents were published for a 6 week period from 13 July to 25 August 2015.
During this period, the application documents were made available to view at Harlesden Library and Wembley Library. The documents are also available to download.
The documents can also be viewed on the OPDC website.
The joint application for the Harlesden Neighbourhood Area and Forum designation includes a:
The consultation is now closed.
- map identifying the Harlesden Neighbourhood Area
- statement explaining why this area is considered appropriate for designation as the Harlesden Neighbourhood Area
- statement explaining how the proposed forum meets the conditions set out in legislation
- description of the consultation process undertaken to identify a neighbourhood boundary and;
- statement declaring the Harlesden Neighbourhood Forum as a relevant body, a list of forum members and the Harlesden Neighbourhood Forum Constitution.
Please noteIf the designation of the Harlesden Neighbourhood Area and the Harlesden Neighbourhood Forum is made, no other organisation or body may be designated for that neighbourhood area until that designation expires or is withdrawn.
The next stepsAfter considering all comments received, the council and OPDC will determine the applications separately and will publish statements setting out the decision in relation to designating the forum and area, and the reason for making that decision.
The OPDC will be responsible for designating the neighbourhood area and forum for land within the Mayoral Development Area, whilst we will be responsible for designating both within the remainder of the proposed neighbourhood area.
"In April we submitted applications to Brent Council and the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) to designate our neighbourhood plan area and neighbourhood forum.Register here (there is no need to print a ticket).
"They have responded that we need to amend one point in our constitution in order for the neighbourhood forum application to go forward. The clause in question is in section 7 of the constitution: 'The Committee may refuse membership, or may terminate or suspend the membership of any member by resolution passed at a Committee meeting where it is considered membership would be detrimental'.
"The proposed amendment to the constitution is that this clause is removed from the Harlesden Neighbourhood Planning Forum constitution in order to meet the local planning authorities’ requirements.
"Those who qualify for full Forum membership will vote on removing this clause as proposed. Amendments to the constitution can only be discussed at a special meeting of the Forum (rather than an ordinary general meeting). We are therefore calling a special meeting of the Forum for Monday 6th July, 6.30 – 8.30pm.
"We will need a minimum of 15 full Forum members there so please encourage local friends, colleagues and neighbours to join the meeting. If they are not yet a member they can contact Sara for a membership form at firstname.lastname@example.org.